E3 Inspector of police - Minjur PS vs Suresh — 263/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 323, 509, 506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTR310028012025
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
07-09-2025
Filing Number
2781/2025
Filing Date
08-09-2025
Registration No
263/2025
Registration Date
08-09-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Ponneri
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate No.1, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
E3 Inspector of police - Minjur PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Suresh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate No.1, Ponneri
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 26-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of witnesses in Criminal Case No. 263/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate at Ponneri, not a final court order. It records the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of two prosecution witnesses (Mohana and Selvam) on 26/11/2025, who testified regarding allegations of assault, abusive language, and theft of jewelry by the accused (Suresh and Parvin). The witnesses' credibility was challenged during cross-examination, with the defense suggesting the complaint was false and motivated by revenge over a disputed loan of ₹1,50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Copy of Deposition
This document is a deposition of witnesses in Criminal Case No. 263/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate at Ponneri, not a final court order. It records the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of two prosecution witnesses (Mohana and Selvam) on 26/11/2025, who testified regarding allegations of assault, abusive language, and theft of jewelry by the accused (Suresh and Parvin). The witnesses' credibility was challenged during cross-examination, with the defense suggesting the complaint was false and motivated by revenge over a disputed loan of ₹1,50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts