Soni Arugumugam Mudaliar, vs Vijay Bhaskar Mudaliar Advocate - P.S. Seetha Raman, Prasanth — 48/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
MC - Maintenance Case
CNR: TNTR290077642024
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
Filing Number
52/2024
Filing Date
18-09-2024
Registration No
48/2024
Registration Date
18-09-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Soni Arugumugam Mudaliar,
Adv. S.Saravanan, D.Udhayasuriyan, A.Venkatesh, K.Santhoshkumari and M.Suresh
Praneeth Vijay Bhaska
Respondent(s)
Vijay Bhaskar Mudaliar Advocate - P.S. Seetha Raman, Prasanth
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record, not a court order with a final judgment. It records the sworn testimony of the witness (PW 1) in case MC.No. 48/2024 dated February 7, 2026, before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur. The witness (a woman in a matrimonial dispute) gave detailed testimony regarding alleged domestic harassment, maintenance issues, and a divorce petition filed by her husband, but no substantive court order or judgment is issued in this document—it merely documents her testimony as read and admitted in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record, not a court order with a final judgment. It records the sworn testimony of the witness (PW 1) in case MC.No. 48/2024 dated February 7, 2026, before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur. The witness (a woman in a matrimonial dispute) gave detailed testimony regarding alleged domestic harassment, maintenance issues, and a divorce petition filed by her husband, but no substantive court order or judgment is issued in this document—it merely documents her testimony as read and admitted in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts