V3 JJ Nagar Ps, Christina S/o. Muthamil Selvan vs Kavidhasan (Settu) S/o. Kathavarayan — 129/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section u/S341,392,506(I),R/W34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th August 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTR290038582021
Filing Number
3812/2021
Filing Date
23-Oct-2021
Registration No
129/2022
Registration Date
26-Aug-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
622
Police Station
J.J.Nagar P.S.,
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.V3 JJ Nagar Ps (Police Station), Christina S/o. Muthamil Selvan
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kavidhasan (Settu) S/o. Kathavarayan
-
2.Sakthivel, S/o. Sambath
Case History
-
10-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-Jul-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-May-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: CC.No. 129/2022 This is a witness deposition hearing dated 29.05.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur. The case involves a complaint (FIR 622/2021) filed under IPC sections 341, 392, 506(1) against respondents Kavidhasan and Sakthivel regarding alleged theft of a vehicle (TN 85 C 9128). The witness (PW.4), a retired forensic examiner, testified about the investigation and challenged key aspects of the prosecution's case during cross-examination, including discrepancies in witness statements, lack of identification of accused persons, missing CCTV evidence, and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The witness expressed doubts about the validity of confessional statements and cast serious doubts on the prosecution's case credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-May-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
07-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-Sep-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-Sep-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-Sep-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-May-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
09-May-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2023
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2023
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jan-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 129/2022
Case Summary: CC.No. 129/2022 This is a witness deposition hearing dated 29.05.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur. The case involves a complaint (FIR 622/2021) filed under IPC sections 341, 392, 506(1) against respondents Kavidhasan and Sakthivel regarding alleged theft of a vehicle (TN 85 C 9128). The witness (PW.4), a retired forensic examiner, testified about the investigation and challenged key aspects of the prosecution's case during cross-examination, including discrepancies in witness statements, lack of identification of accused persons, missing CCTV evidence, and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The witness expressed doubts about the validity of confessional statements and cast serious doubts on the prosecution's case credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts