The Inspector of Police vs Srinivasan — 368/2012
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409,467,468,471and477(A)IPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTR290001902012
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Date
19-03-2012
Registration No
368/2012
Registration Date
19-03-2012
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Inspector of Police
Respondent(s)
Srinivasan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 19-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 24-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (P.W. 3) recorded on 20.01.2025 in Criminal Case No. 368/2012 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur. The witness testified regarding alleged financial irregularities by S.I. (M) Srinivasan, a CRPF cashier, who withdrew Rs. 84,000 on 23.10.2008 and deposited it the next day without obtaining proper approval from the head office, in violation of cash handling instructions. The deposition details findings by the new cashier that the transaction was not properly recorded in the cash book and lacked required authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (P.W. 3) recorded on 20.01.2025 in Criminal Case No. 368/2012 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur. The witness testified regarding alleged financial irregularities by S.I. (M) Srinivasan, a CRPF cashier, who withdrew Rs. 84,000 on 23.10.2008 and deposited it the next day without obtaining proper approval from the head office, in violation of cash handling instructions. The deposition details findings by the new cashier that the transaction was not properly recorded in the cash book and lacked required authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts