Sub Inspector of Police, H8 Thiruvottiyur PS vs Narayanan and 2 others( Sulochana, Sasikumar) Advocate - Radha pandiyan, Aravindhan, Raghuman, Kaviraj — 257/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(ii). Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTR280009232022
Filing Number
916/2022
Filing Date
09-09-2022
Registration No
257/2022
Registration Date
09-09-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvottiyur
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector of Police, H8 Thiruvottiyur PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Narayanan and 2 others( Sulochana, Sasikumar) Advocate - Radha pandiyan, Aravindhan, Raghuman, Kaviraj
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness deposition (PW 1) recorded on 30.07.2025 in the Judicial Magistrate Court at Tiruvottiyur (Case No. 257/2022). The witness, a 38-year-old woman, testified about an incident on 16.05.2022 involving alleged abuse and injury to her child. The court examined the witness's account regarding the circumstances of the incident, medical treatment received, and statements made to police, with the judge evaluating the credibility and consistency of her testimony under the Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter XXIII. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness deposition (PW 1) recorded on 30.07.2025 in the Judicial Magistrate Court at Tiruvottiyur (Case No. 257/2022). The witness, a 38-year-old woman, testified about an incident on 16.05.2022 involving alleged abuse and injury to her child. The court examined the witness's account regarding the circumstances of the incident, medical treatment received, and statements made to police, with the judge evaluating the credibility and consistency of her testimony under the Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter XXIII. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts