M/s.Sree Arumuga Steel Traders, Manager Sathesh kumar vs Pranitha Traders Rep Abithulla — 22/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTR280002932023
Filing Number
291/2023
Filing Date
11-Jan-2023
Registration No
22/2023
Registration Date
11-Jan-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvottiyur
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s.Sree Arumuga Steel Traders, Manager Sathesh kumar
Adv. K.Thenrajan, S.Krishnamoorthy, K.Rahul
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pranitha Traders Rep Abithulla
Case History
-
01-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Nov-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Case No.: CC.NO.22/2023 | Date: 15.11.2024 This is a civil court proceeding in Tamil involving a commercial dispute regarding direct supply/purchase transactions. The first witness (PW1), a 45-year-old individual employed for five years by a private company engaged in steel and cement trading, testified about payment terms and trade practices involving 15, 30, or 45-day credit periods for goods purchased. The witness confirmed business dealings with the company dating back to 2022. The case appears to be recorded at the examination stage with witness testimony being documented; no final order on bail, petition, or judgment has been issued yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2024
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Oct-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jul-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jul-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jun-2023
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jun-2023
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-May-2023
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-May-2023
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Apr-2023
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2023
Case Summary Case No.: CC.NO.22/2023 | Date: 15.11.2024 This is a civil court proceeding in Tamil involving a commercial dispute regarding direct supply/purchase transactions. The first witness (PW1), a 45-year-old individual employed for five years by a private company engaged in steel and cement trading, testified about payment terms and trade practices involving 15, 30, or 45-day credit periods for goods purchased. The witness confirmed business dealings with the company dating back to 2022. The case appears to be recorded at the examination stage with witness testimony being documented; no final order on bail, petition, or judgment has been issued yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts