Inspector of Police, All Women PS, Tiruvottiyur vs Senthilkumar and 3 others — 82/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),406,34IPC. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTR280000892018
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
82/2018
Filing Date
24-01-2018
Registration No
82/2018
Registration Date
24-01-2018
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvottiyur
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, All Women PS (Police Station), Tiruvottiyur
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Senthilkumar and 3 others
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Judgement
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: CC/82/2018 | Court: Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvottiyur | Date: 28/11/2025 Outcome: Witness PW5/LW5 deposition recorded. The witness testified regarding a dowry harassment complaint (FIR No. 150/2017) filed under IPC Sections 498A, 406 r/w 34 and TNPHW Act Section 4, alleging cruelty and property misappropriation by the accused between 2012-2017. The court found the witness's testimony credible on material facts but noted insufficient evidence on certain procedural aspects regarding emergency provisions under CrPC Section 1, 2, 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: CC/82/2018 | Court: Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvottiyur | Date: 28/11/2025 Outcome: Witness PW5/LW5 deposition recorded. The witness testified regarding a dowry harassment complaint (FIR No. 150/2017) filed under IPC Sections 498A, 406 r/w 34 and TNPHW Act Section 4, alleging cruelty and property misappropriation by the accused between 2012-2017. The court found the witness's testimony credible on material facts but noted insufficient evidence on certain procedural aspects regarding emergency provisions under CrPC Section 1, 2, 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts