INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SHOLAVARAM POLICE STATION vs PARTHIBAN — 149/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 393. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTR270011442023
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
Filing Number
1132/2023
Filing Date
15-06-2023
Registration No
149/2023
Registration Date
15-06-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Ponneri
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SHOLAVARAM POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PARTHIBAN
SAI @ ARAVINTH
MURUGAN
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document contains witness depositions (P.W. 1 and P.W. 2) in Criminal Case No. 149/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court II, Ponneri, dated 25/02/2026. The prosecution witnesses testified regarding the arrest of three accused persons (Marthin, Sai/Aravind, and Murukan) who were apprehended with a knife and weapons during a police patrol on 15.09.2019. Both witnesses provided statements about the confessional statements obtained from the accused and the recovery of evidence, which were cross-examined by the defense, questioning details about patrol documentation, specific descriptions of the weapon, and the circumstances of arrest. The case proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document contains witness depositions (P.W. 1 and P.W. 2) in Criminal Case No. 149/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court II, Ponneri, dated 25/02/2026. The prosecution witnesses testified regarding the arrest of three accused persons (Marthin, Sai/Aravind, and Murukan) who were apprehended with a knife and weapons during a police patrol on 15.09.2019. Both witnesses provided statements about the confessional statements obtained from the accused and the recovery of evidence, which were cross-examined by the defense, questioning details about patrol documentation, specific descriptions of the weapon, and the circumstances of arrest. The case proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts