DHANASEKAR vs E5 SHOLAVARAM PS — 443/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),296(b),308(2),351(3) r/w3(5). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR270006762026
Filing Number
675/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
443/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Ponneri
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHANASEKAR
Adv. S.YUVARAJ
-
2.ravikumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.E5 SHOLAVARAM PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Ponneri granted bail to two accused persons (Dhanasekar and Ravikumar) who were arrested under sections 329(4), 296(b), 308(2), 351(3), and 3(5) BNS. The court allowed the petition considering they had been in judicial custody for 22 days, co-accused were already released, and in the interest of justice. The accused were ordered to execute a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, report daily to the police station for 30 days, remain available for investigation, and refrain from tampering with witnesses or committing further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri
-
11-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri
-
10-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri
-
06-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri
-
03-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri
-
02-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri
-
26-Feb-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 443/2026
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Ponneri granted bail to two accused persons (Dhanasekar and Ravikumar) who were arrested under sections 329(4), 296(b), 308(2), 351(3), and 3(5) BNS. The court allowed the petition considering they had been in judicial custody for 22 days, co-accused were already released, and in the interest of justice. The accused were ordered to execute a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, report daily to the police station for 30 days, remain available for investigation, and refrain from tampering with witnesses or committing further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts