The State Of Tamilnadu Rep Inspector Of Police E5 Sholavaram Cr No 366 2019 vs Accused Ranjithkumar And 4 Others — 87/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,323,324,427,506(II). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTR270006202024

e-Filing Number

06-02-2024

Filing Number

617/2024

Filing Date

15-Feb-2024

Registration No

87/2024

Registration Date

15-Feb-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Ponneri

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,323,324,427,506(II)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Tamilnadu Rep Inspector Of Police E5 Sholavaram Cr No 366 2019

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Accused Ranjithkumar And 4 Others

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a witness deposition (P.W. 7) in Criminal Case No. 87/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate II, Ponneri, dated 06/03/2026. The prosecution witness testified that five individuals attacked him and his employer at a tea shop on 23.06.2019, causing injuries to multiple people including the employer who received four stitches on his head. The witness underwent cross-examination where the defense questioned the credibility of his account, suggesting inconsistencies regarding the presence of accused persons and the reliability of photographic evidence presented (marked as Exhibit A.2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  9. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  11. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  12. 28-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  13. 02-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  14. 27-May-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  15. 22-Apr-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  16. 04-Mar-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  17. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  18. 03-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  19. 29-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  20. 08-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  21. 13-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  22. 27-Aug-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  23. 16-Jul-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  24. 11-Jun-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  25. 14-May-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  26. 16-Apr-2024

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

  27. 15-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 15-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 87/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness deposition (P.W. 7) in Criminal Case No. 87/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate II, Ponneri, dated 06/03/2026. The prosecution witness testified that five individuals attacked him and his employer at a tea shop on 23.06.2019, causing injuries to multiple people including the employer who received four stitches on his head. The witness underwent cross-examination where the defense questioned the credibility of his account, suggesting inconsistencies regarding the presence of accused persons and the reliability of photographic evidence presented (marked as Exhibit A.2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case