M/s. Mariya Enterprises, The Proprietor Mr. Y. Esak vs M/s. Shree Balaji Steel Corporation, The Proprietor Mr. Venkatachalapathi, — 1951/2015

Case under --- Section 138NIACT. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTR270001152015

Evidence

Next Hearing

02nd April 2026

Filing Number

1951/2015

Filing Date

28-12-2015

Registration No

1951/2015

Registration Date

25-09-2015

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Ponneri

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

Acts & Sections

--- Section 138NIACT
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section M/s. Mariya Enterprises, The Proprietor Mr. Y. EsakM/s. Shree Balaji Steel Corporation, The Proprietor Mr. Venkatachalapathi
Mp/3/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section M/s. Mariya Enterprises, The Proprietor Mr. Y. EsakM/s. Shree Balaji Steel Corporation, The Proprietor Mr. Venkatachalapathi

Petitioner(s)

M/s. Mariya Enterprises, The Proprietor Mr. Y. Esak

Adv. S. Balamurugan

Respondent(s)

M/s. Shree Balaji Steel Corporation, The Proprietor Mr. Venkatachalapathi,

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

06-03-2026

Evidence

05-03-2026

Evidence

26-02-2026

Evidence

05-02-2026

Evidence

19-12-2025

Questioning

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Defence Witness (D.W. 1) was examined on oath before the Judicial Magistrate No. II, Ponneri in S.T.C. No. 1951/2015 on 06/03/2026, with examination-in-chief completed and documentary evidence (cash bills and records from Balaji Steel Corporation) marked as exhibits. Cross-examination by the complainant's counsel was deferred/postponed as requested by the defence counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Defence Witness (D.W. 1) was examined on oath before the Judicial Magistrate No. II, Ponneri in S.T.C. No. 1951/2015 on 06/03/2026, with examination-in-chief completed and documentary evidence (cash bills and records from Balaji Steel Corporation) marked as exhibits. Cross-examination by the complainant's counsel was deferred/postponed as requested by the defence counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Ponneri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case