Mathew Joseph rep by his power Agent, P.Prakash vs M.Kaliyammal — 281/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR220005412023
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
678/2023
Filing Date
31-10-2023
Registration No
281/2023
Registration Date
16-11-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Ambattur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mathew Joseph rep by his power Agent, P.Prakash
Adv. T.K.Vijayakanthan
P.Prakash
Adv. T.K.Vijayakanthan
Respondent(s)
M.Kaliyammal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 31-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a civil suit (O.S. No. 281/2023) filed in the Ambattur District Court regarding a property dispute. The court recorded the testimony of the plaintiff and defendant regarding a rental agreement and land possession. The case involves a dispute over whether a valid lease agreement exists and allegations of unauthorized occupation of a 100 sq.ft. portion of land. The cross-examination of the defendant has been completed with no re-examination required, and the matter is pending adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a civil suit (O.S. No. 281/2023) filed in the Ambattur District Court regarding a property dispute. The court recorded the testimony of the plaintiff and defendant regarding a rental agreement and land possession. The case involves a dispute over whether a valid lease agreement exists and allegations of unauthorized occupation of a 100 sq.ft. portion of land. The cross-examination of the defendant has been completed with no re-examination required, and the matter is pending adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts