Mathew Joseph rep by his power Agent, P.Prakash vs C.Jayaraj — 271/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR220005342023
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
671/2023
Filing Date
31-10-2023
Registration No
271/2023
Registration Date
15-11-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Ambattur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mathew Joseph rep by his power Agent, P.Prakash
Adv. T.K.Vijayakanthan
P.Prakash
Adv. T.K.Vijayakanthan
Respondent(s)
C.Jayaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 31-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 277/2023) from the Ambattur Madhavada District Court, dated 25.02.2026, involving a property dispute under the Indian Contract Act, 1873 (Section 10). The case concerns a dispute over a land/property agreement between the plaintiff and defendant, with the plaintiff claiming entitlement to the property based on an alleged agreement, while the defendant disputes the validity and existence of such agreement. The court heard arguments from both parties and recorded cross-examination statements, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings and adjudication on the merits of the property claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 277/2023) from the Ambattur Madhavada District Court, dated 25.02.2026, involving a property dispute under the Indian Contract Act, 1873 (Section 10). The case concerns a dispute over a land/property agreement between the plaintiff and defendant, with the plaintiff claiming entitlement to the property based on an alleged agreement, while the defendant disputes the validity and existence of such agreement. The court heard arguments from both parties and recorded cross-examination statements, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings and adjudication on the merits of the property claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts