Mathew Joseph rep by his power Agent, P.Prakash vs C.Jayaraj — 271/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTR220005342023

Arguments

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

Filing Number

671/2023

Filing Date

31-10-2023

Registration No

271/2023

Registration Date

15-11-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Ambattur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 43(2)

Petitioner(s)

Mathew Joseph rep by his power Agent, P.Prakash

Adv. T.K.Vijayakanthan

P.Prakash

Adv. T.K.Vijayakanthan

Respondent(s)

C.Jayaraj

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

06-03-2026

Arguments

25-02-2026

Evidence

07-02-2026

Evidence

06-01-2026

Evidence

31-10-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

25-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

SUMMARY: This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 277/2023) from the Ambattur Madhavada District Court, dated 25.02.2026, involving a property dispute under the Indian Contract Act, 1873 (Section 10). The case concerns a dispute over a land/property agreement between the plaintiff and defendant, with the plaintiff claiming entitlement to the property based on an alleged agreement, while the defendant disputes the validity and existence of such agreement. The court heard arguments from both parties and recorded cross-examination statements, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings and adjudication on the merits of the property claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 277/2023) from the Ambattur Madhavada District Court, dated 25.02.2026, involving a property dispute under the Indian Contract Act, 1873 (Section 10). The case concerns a dispute over a land/property agreement between the plaintiff and defendant, with the plaintiff claiming entitlement to the property based on an alleged agreement, while the defendant disputes the validity and existence of such agreement. The court heard arguments from both parties and recorded cross-examination statements, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings and adjudication on the merits of the property claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Ambattur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case