B.Gnanagurusamy vs B.Jayaseeli — 93/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR220001652025
Filing Number
250/2025
Filing Date
15-Apr-2025
Registration No
93/2025
Registration Date
16-Apr-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Ambattur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.B.Gnanagurusamy
Adv. Pon.Kannan
Respondent(s)
-
1.B.Jayaseeli
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The District Munsif Court at Ambattur granted a permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff B. Gnanagurusamy against his mother Mrs. B. Jayaseeli, restraining her from evicting him from the suit property except through due process of law. The court found that the plaintiff had established lawful possession of the property (evidenced by gas bills and other documents), that the defendant was attempting to disturb his peaceful possession, and that even one in settled possession cannot be dispossessed without legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif
-
18-Feb-2026
Judgement
District Munsif
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
12-Dec-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
05-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
05-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
19-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
18-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
16-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
16-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2025
The District Munsif Court at Ambattur granted a permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff B. Gnanagurusamy against his mother Mrs. B. Jayaseeli, restraining her from evicting him from the suit property except through due process of law. The court found that the plaintiff had established lawful possession of the property (evidenced by gas bills and other documents), that the defendant was attempting to disturb his peaceful possession, and that even one in settled possession cannot be dispossessed without legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts