KAMAALEEBEE vs KAMAL SHAIB Advocate - C.A. Natarajan — 125/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S25(b),25(d),27(C)OFTNCFACT. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR210002022015
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
125/2015
Filing Date
14-10-2015
Registration No
125/2015
Registration Date
03-11-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAMAALEEBEE
Adv. V.VENKATESAN AND OTHERS
Bommanibeebi
Adv. V.VENKATESAN
Hameedabee
Adv. V.VENKATESAN
Respondent(s)
KAMAL SHAIB Advocate - C.A. Natarajan
M.K. Kadhar
Adv. C.A. Natarajan
Fathima
Adv. C.A. Natarajan
S.M. Rafee
J.B. Kadhar
Masthaneebi
The District Collector, Tiruvallur
The Tahsildar, Tiruttani
The Sub Registrar, Tiruttani
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Steps
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Steps |
| 06-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 27-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 17-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 09-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under CPC Order 1 Rule 10(2) to implead five additional defendants (proposed parties 10-14) as necessary parties in a property dispute suit was allowed. The court found them to be proper and necessary parties being subsequent purchasers of the disputed property, and allowed their impleading in the interest of justice to prevent multiplicity of proceedings. The petitioners were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 350 to the 2nd respondent by 16.11.2021, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under CPC Order 1 Rule 10(2) to implead five additional defendants (proposed parties 10-14) as necessary parties in a property dispute suit was allowed. The court found them to be proper and necessary parties being subsequent purchasers of the disputed property, and allowed their impleading in the interest of justice to prevent multiplicity of proceedings. The petitioners were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 350 to the 2nd respondent by 16.11.2021, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts