Thanigachalam vs 1. Natarajan and 3 others Advocate - A. Haridoss — 70/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR210000932022
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
133/2022
Filing Date
20-10-2022
Registration No
70/2022
Registration Date
20-10-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thanigachalam
Adv. S. Karthikeyan
Respondent(s)
1. Natarajan and 3 others Advocate - A. Haridoss
Venkatesan
Adv. A. Haridoss
Harikrishnan
Adv. A. Haridoss
Ethirajulu
Adv. A. Haridoss
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil suit (A.V. No. 70/2022) from the District Munsiff Court, Tiruttani, filed on February 18, 2026, concerning a property dispute. The document records the cross-examination testimony of Defendant's Witness 1 (Nadarajan, age 91, a farmer) regarding agricultural land and residential structures. The witness testified about property ownership, boundary disputes, and documentary evidence including a will executed by his father-in-law. No final judgment or order is provided in this document—it only contains the witness examination transcript and notes that no further cross-examination will occur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil suit (A.V. No. 70/2022) from the District Munsiff Court, Tiruttani, filed on February 18, 2026, concerning a property dispute. The document records the cross-examination testimony of Defendant's Witness 1 (Nadarajan, age 91, a farmer) regarding agricultural land and residential structures. The witness testified about property ownership, boundary disputes, and documentary evidence including a will executed by his father-in-law. No final judgment or order is provided in this document—it only contains the witness examination transcript and notes that no further cross-examination will occur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts