G.MANI vs SUBRAMANI Advocate - V. Venkatesan — 65/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 30,27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR210000692018
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
69/2018
Filing Date
04-09-2018
Registration No
65/2018
Registration Date
04-09-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.MANI
Adv. N. Kumar
Respondent(s)
SUBRAMANI Advocate - V. Venkatesan
Vasu
Adv. V. Venkatesan
Sivakumar (Died)
Adv. V. Venkatesan
Vadivel
Adv. V. Venkatesan
Tahsildhar, Tiruttani
Adv. K.L. Jayaprakesh, GP
The District Collector, Tiruvallur
Adv. K.L. Jayaprakesh, GP
Saliyamma
Nathiya
Sridharshan
Adv. G.Sivakumar
Jayashri
Adv. G.Sivakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 65/2018 District Munsiff Court, Tiruthani — On 10.04.2026, the court recorded the cross-examination of witness Lakshmi (age 57, farmer from Sathyaranchaepuram) regarding Schedule A and Schedule B properties. The witness testified about property ownership disputes and denied allegations of producing false documents. The court adjourned cross-examination of defendants 5 and 6 as requested by their counsel, while cross-examination of defendants 9 and 10 concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 65/2018 District Munsiff Court, Tiruthani — On 10.04.2026, the court recorded the cross-examination of witness Lakshmi (age 57, farmer from Sathyaranchaepuram) regarding Schedule A and Schedule B properties. The witness testified about property ownership disputes and denied allegations of producing false documents. The court adjourned cross-examination of defendants 5 and 6 as requested by their counsel, while cross-examination of defendants 9 and 10 concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts