VELLATHUR MUDALI (Died) vs K.ARUMUTHU (Died) Advocate - V. Kishore Reddy — 41/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)OFTNCFACT. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR210000572015
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
41/2015
Filing Date
13-03-2015
Registration No
41/2015
Registration Date
16-03-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VELLATHUR MUDALI (Died)
Adv. V. Venkatesan
S.K. Arumugam
Adv. V. Venkatesan
P.S. Krishnan
Adv. V. Venkatesan
Kristappa Mudali
Adv. V. Venkatesan
Duraisamy Mudaliar (Died)
Adv. V. Venkatesan
Venkatesan
Adv. V. Venkatesan
N.C. Subbaiyan
Adv. V. Venkatesan
Respondent(s)
K.ARUMUTHU (Died) Advocate - V. Kishore Reddy
N. Krishnan
K.A. Pillayar
P.G. Nagalingam
Thangavel (Died)
P.A. Vinayagam
Vedatchala Mudaliar
A.V. Palani
P.G. Sanjeevi
G.R. Kumaravel
P.S. Durvasulu
P.N. Ganesan
P.A. Srinivasan
N.V. Subramani
K. Haribabu
P.R. Balaraman
N.K. Annadurai
M.G. Devarajan
K.V. Chidambaram
K.A. Srinivasan
N. Boopalan
P.R. Darmalingam
P.K. Elumalai
P.T. Vinayagam
A.E. Jayaraman
Kutti Arunagiri
Parijatham
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Nirmala
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Narayanasamy
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Srinivasan
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 41/2015 District Munsiff Court, Tiruttani | Date: March 4, 2026 This is a property dispute case involving land belonging to the Sengunthar Mudali community. The second witness testified regarding disputed property claims between two sub-groups (A and B divisions) of approximately 400 families. The witness's testimony addressed issues of property ownership, representation rights, and the validity of the claim, noting that only 7 individuals (not all members of the B division) challenged the claim, and that both divisions jointly sold portions of the property in 2009. The court examined testimonies regarding property sales, donations made to a government school, and questioned whether the false claim should be dismissed due to incomplete representation of parties and omission of third-party buyers and donee institution from proceedings. No cross-examination was conducted. Case status: Pending final judgment (मुख्य निर्णय इंगित नहीं किया गया) This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 41/2015 District Munsiff Court, Tiruttani | Date: March 4, 2026 This is a property dispute case involving land belonging to the Sengunthar Mudali community. The second witness testified regarding disputed property claims between two sub-groups (A and B divisions) of approximately 400 families. The witness's testimony addressed issues of property ownership, representation rights, and the validity of the claim, noting that only 7 individuals (not all members of the B division) challenged the claim, and that both divisions jointly sold portions of the property in 2009. The court examined testimonies regarding property sales, donations made to a government school, and questioned whether the false claim should be dismissed due to incomplete representation of parties and omission of third-party buyers and donee institution from proceedings. No cross-examination was conducted. Case status: Pending final judgment (मुख्य निर्णय इंगित नहीं किया गया) This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts