R.JAYARAMARAJU vs G.SUBRAMANIYA RAJU Advocate - V. Venkatesan — 58/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S7R1CPC. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR210000562014
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
58/2014
Filing Date
22-04-2014
Registration No
58/2014
Registration Date
22-04-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.JAYARAMARAJU
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
M. Subramaniam Raju
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
M. Subramanyam Raju (Died)
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Respondent(s)
G.SUBRAMANIYA RAJU Advocate - V. Venkatesan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Steps
Steps
Amendment
Orders
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Steps |
| 02-04-2026 | Steps |
| 24-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 04-03-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 58/2014 The District Munsif Court at Tiruttani allowed the petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC to implead three proposed parties (K. Subramaniam Raju, M. Dhananjeya Raju, and R. Madhusudan, representatives of Sri Rama Bazanai Koil) as plaintiffs 4-6 in the original suit against G. Subramaniya Raju. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 58/2014 The District Munsif Court at Tiruttani allowed the petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC to implead three proposed parties (K. Subramaniam Raju, M. Dhananjeya Raju, and R. Madhusudan, representatives of Sri Rama Bazanai Koil) as plaintiffs 4-6 in the original suit against G. Subramaniya Raju. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts