Lakshmiammal (Died) vs Sankar(Died) Advocate - G. Kamalakannan — 36/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s25(d). Status: Ex-Parte Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR210000412021
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
60/2021
Filing Date
28-04-2021
Registration No
36/2021
Registration Date
28-04-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakshmiammal (Died)
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Subba Reddy (Died)
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Anandhan
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Jayaraman
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Navaneetham
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Someasekar
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Pattabi
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Pushpavathi
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Kandhamma
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Loganathan
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Subramaniyam
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Parasuramudu
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Bhagyalakshmi
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Rajendran
Adv. V. Kishore Reddy
Respondent(s)
Sankar(Died) Advocate - G. Kamalakannan
The District Collector, Tiruvallure,
The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruttani
The Tahsildar Turuttani
Amalanaidu
Bala Shree
Rejeshwari
Baskar Naidu
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 24-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 27-02-2026 | Amendment |
| 19-02-2026 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 36/2021, IA No. 3/2024 The District Munsif Court at Tiruttani allowed the petition filed on September 11, 2024, to implead six proposed parties (numbered 9-14) as additional plaintiffs in the original suit. The first respondent was marked exparte for non-appearance, and no costs were imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 36/2021, IA No. 3/2024 The District Munsif Court at Tiruttani allowed the petition filed on September 11, 2024, to implead six proposed parties (numbered 9-14) as additional plaintiffs in the original suit. The first respondent was marked exparte for non-appearance, and no costs were imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts