S. Ramesh vs Ranimmal (died) Advocate - V. Prakash — 25/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s 27(c). Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR210000292021
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
41/2021
Filing Date
25-03-2021
Registration No
25/2021
Registration Date
25-03-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Ramesh
Adv. C.A. Natarajan
Respondent(s)
Ranimmal (died) Advocate - V. Prakash
Panchalai
Adv. V. Prakash
Rajathi
Adv. V. Prakash
Kasthuri
Adv. V. Prakash
Muniammal
Adv. V. Prakash
S. Balaji
Adv. V. Prakash
Vengadesan
V. Prakesh
V.Sumathi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Written Statement
Written Statement
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Written Statement |
| 12-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 04-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 23-02-2026 | Amendment |
| 12-02-2026 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Case 25/2021 Summary: S. Ramesh filed an interlocutory application (I.A. No. 2/2025) under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC seeking to amend the plaint against nine respondents/defendants. The District Munsif, Tiruttani allowed the petition on 6th December 2025, permitting the amendment to the plaint. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 25/2021 Summary: S. Ramesh filed an interlocutory application (I.A. No. 2/2025) under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC seeking to amend the plaint against nine respondents/defendants. The District Munsif, Tiruttani allowed the petition on 6th December 2025, permitting the amendment to the plaint. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts