M. SANKAR vs K.DURAI alias DURAIKANNU (Died) Advocate - P.C. Santhya Rani — 28/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a),27(c),31. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR210000282018
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
28/2018
Filing Date
27-04-2018
Registration No
28/2018
Registration Date
27-04-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M. SANKAR
Adv. R.SRINIVASAN
S. Dilipkumar
Adv. R.SRINIVASAN
Respondent(s)
K.DURAI alias DURAIKANNU (Died) Advocate - P.C. Santhya Rani
Munusamy
Adv. P.C. Santhya Rani
Chinnappan
Adv. P.C. Santhya Rani
Nagammal
Adv. P.C. Santhya Rani
Gowri
Adv. P.C. Santhya Rani
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil-language civil court order from the District Court in Tiruthani (Case No. A.V. 28/2018) dated March 6, 2026. The document records cross-examination testimony of the second defendant (Narasimman, a 70-year-old farmer) regarding a property dispute involving inherited agricultural and residential land. The testimony discusses the division of property among four heirs and the sale/transfer of shares, but the document does not contain a final court order or judgment—it only contains the witness examination transcript. SKIP — while readable, this document lacks a conclusive court order/outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil-language civil court order from the District Court in Tiruthani (Case No. A.V. 28/2018) dated March 6, 2026. The document records cross-examination testimony of the second defendant (Narasimman, a 70-year-old farmer) regarding a property dispute involving inherited agricultural and residential land. The testimony discusses the division of property among four heirs and the sale/transfer of shares, but the document does not contain a final court order or judgment—it only contains the witness examination transcript. SKIP — while readable, this document lacks a conclusive court order/outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts