parimala vs Rajagopal Advocate - G. Kamalakannan — 8/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR210000112021
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
13/2021
Filing Date
27-01-2021
Registration No
8/2021
Registration Date
27-01-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
parimala
Adv. V.S.Velayudham
Respondent(s)
Rajagopal Advocate - G. Kamalakannan
Sankar
Adv. G. Kamalakannan
senthil
Adv. G. Kamalakannan
Raja
Adv. G. Kamalakannan
Chitra
Adv. G. Kamalakannan
Kavitha
Adv. G. Kamalakannan
Manikandan
Adv. G. Kamalakannan
Monisha
Adv. G. Kamalakannan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 8/2021 - Parimala v. Rajagopal Advocate & Others District Civil Court, Tirupati | Order dated 27.03.2026 Cross-examination of Witness 2 (petitioner's witness) continued against Defendants 1, 3-8. The witness (39-year-old male) testified regarding a 2005 deed document and disputed property claims, denying allegations that documents were fabricated and asserting his mother's legitimate inheritance rights to scheduled properties. No cross-examination by respondents was recorded. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 8/2021 - Parimala v. Rajagopal Advocate & Others District Civil Court, Tirupati | Order dated 27.03.2026 Cross-examination of Witness 2 (petitioner's witness) continued against Defendants 1, 3-8. The witness (39-year-old male) testified regarding a 2005 deed document and disputed property claims, denying allegations that documents were fabricated and asserting his mother's legitimate inheritance rights to scheduled properties. No cross-examination by respondents was recorded. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts