M.JAYARAMAN vs NEELAKANDAN Advocate - G. Kamalakannan — 6/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR210000062018
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
6/2018
Filing Date
11-01-2018
Registration No
6/2018
Registration Date
11-01-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.JAYARAMAN
Adv. V.S.Velayudham
Respondent(s)
NEELAKANDAN Advocate - G. Kamalakannan
Duraisamy
Adv. G. Kamalakannan
Mohan
Adv. G. Kamalakannan
Vasanthammal (Died)
The Statiion House Officer
The Inspector of Police, Tiruvalangadu circle
A. Dilli Babu
Adv. G. Kamalakannan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This is a District Court case (Case 6/2018) from Tiruttani involving a property dispute between petitioner M. Jayaraman and respondent Neelakandan. On January 30, 2026, the court recorded cross-examination testimony of the first respondent's witness regarding agricultural land, settlement deeds, well constructions, and water usage rights. The case involves disputes over plot numbers 13/3 C and 9/6, including claims about deep borewells and irrigation practices. The cross-examination was adjourned to continue at a later date as per the advocate's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a District Court case (Case 6/2018) from Tiruttani involving a property dispute between petitioner M. Jayaraman and respondent Neelakandan. On January 30, 2026, the court recorded cross-examination testimony of the first respondent's witness regarding agricultural land, settlement deeds, well constructions, and water usage rights. The case involves disputes over plot numbers 13/3 C and 9/6, including claims about deep borewells and irrigation practices. The cross-examination was adjourned to continue at a later date as per the advocate's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts