E.A. Ramesh vs T.M. Radhakrishhnan (died) Advocate - C.A. Natarajan — 97/2009
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O7R1CPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR210000042009
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
97/2009
Filing Date
30-04-2009
Registration No
97/2009
Registration Date
30-04-2009
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
E.A. Ramesh
Adv. P.M. Narasimhan
Respondent(s)
T.M. Radhakrishhnan (died) Advocate - C.A. Natarajan
K. Jayesh
Dhanammal
Adv. C.A. Natarajan
Baskara Reddy
Adv. C.A. Natarajan
Saroja
Sulochana
Premkumari
Mohana
Sundarajan
Saravanan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a property dispute case in the District Munsiff's Court, Tirutani (Case 97/2009) dated March 4, 2026. The court recorded the cross-examination of the third respondent's witness, Ramachandran (70 years old, farmer from Veeraravapuram). The witness testified that he had no knowledge of various claims made by the first respondent Radhakrishnan regarding property documents, the original title holder Salammal, disputed possession claims, and property transfers. The cross-examination focused on competing claims over land plots and their historical ownership/possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a property dispute case in the District Munsiff's Court, Tirutani (Case 97/2009) dated March 4, 2026. The court recorded the cross-examination of the third respondent's witness, Ramachandran (70 years old, farmer from Veeraravapuram). The witness testified that he had no knowledge of various claims made by the first respondent Radhakrishnan regarding property documents, the original title holder Salammal, disputed possession claims, and property transfers. The cross-examination focused on competing claims over land plots and their historical ownership/possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts