Elumalai @ Palayam vs Jothi — 91/2022
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR200001822022
Filing Number
184/2022
Filing Date
02-Dec-2022
Registration No
91/2022
Registration Date
02-Dec-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Ponneri
Judge
1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Elumalai @ Palayam
Adv. R. Krishnaswamy
-
2.Bhavani
-
3.Menagi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jothi
-
2.Saravanan
-
3.Mathi
-
4.Sharmila
-
5.Sumathi
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
26-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary: This is a District Civil Court order from Panneri dated 26.02.2026 in case no. A.V. 91/2022 regarding a property partition dispute. The court examined witness PW1 (Pannuswamy) and conducted cross-examination on matters relating to property division between parties, specifically concerning land distribution and earlier settlements made in 1973 and 1990. The examination revealed conflicting testimonies regarding the exact area allocations (96 cents to different parties) and supporting documents. The court found deficiencies in documentary evidence and inconsistencies in the plaintiff's claims regarding property rights, noting that no settlement deed or partition document was properly filed to support the partition claim. The hearing concluded at 11:41 a.m. on 26.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
22-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
07-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
29-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
05-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
01-Mar-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
01-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
04-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
21-Dec-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
16-Nov-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
19-Oct-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
21-Sep-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
03-Aug-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
06-Jul-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
15-Jun-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
01-Apr-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
02-Mar-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
03-Feb-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
05-Jan-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
02-Dec-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
04-Nov-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
07-Oct-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
02-Sep-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
05-Aug-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
01-Jul-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
09-Jun-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
11-Apr-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
14-Mar-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
14-Feb-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
31-Jan-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Ponneri
-
23-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2022
Summary: This is a District Civil Court order from Panneri dated 26.02.2026 in case no. A.V. 91/2022 regarding a property partition dispute. The court examined witness PW1 (Pannuswamy) and conducted cross-examination on matters relating to property division between parties, specifically concerning land distribution and earlier settlements made in 1973 and 1990. The examination revealed conflicting testimonies regarding the exact area allocations (96 cents to different parties) and supporting documents. The court found deficiencies in documentary evidence and inconsistencies in the plaintiff's claims regarding property rights, noting that no settlement deed or partition document was properly filed to support the partition claim. The hearing concluded at 11:41 a.m. on 26.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts