Umesh kumar vs Vasu @ Vasudevan Advocate - C. Nagendran babu — 115/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR200001682013
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
115/2013
Filing Date
22-04-2013
Registration No
115/2013
Registration Date
22-04-2013
Court
District Munsif Court, Ponneri
Judge
1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Umesh kumar
Adv. R.Kamaraj
Respondent(s)
Vasu @ Vasudevan Advocate - C. Nagendran babu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Judgement
Compliance
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Outcome: Both Interlocutory Applications (IA.9 and IA.10 of 2025) dismissed without costs. Key Order: The District Munsif, Ponneri, rejected the plaintiffs' petitions seeking to summon the Tahsildar as a witness and reopen evidence in Original Suit No.115/2013 (a property dispute). The court held that the plaintiffs already had adequate opportunity to examine the Revenue Divisional Officer (a superior official) on the same matter and had marked documents through him. Reopening evidence at the final arguments stage would merely prolong proceedings without advancing justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Outcome: Both Interlocutory Applications (IA.9 and IA.10 of 2025) dismissed without costs. Key Order: The District Munsif, Ponneri, rejected the plaintiffs' petitions seeking to summon the Tahsildar as a witness and reopen evidence in Original Suit No.115/2013 (a property dispute). The court held that the plaintiffs already had adequate opportunity to examine the Revenue Divisional Officer (a superior official) on the same matter and had marked documents through him. Reopening evidence at the final arguments stage would merely prolong proceedings without advancing justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts