Rathina Bai vs Gruhalakshmi Advocate - S. Kesavan — 52/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderVII,Rule1and2. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR200000822015
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
52/2015
Filing Date
27-02-2015
Registration No
52/2015
Registration Date
27-02-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Ponneri
Judge
1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rathina Bai
Adv. T.Susairaj
Respondent(s)
Gruhalakshmi Advocate - S. Kesavan
Maharani
L. Janarthana Reddy
Adv. Mohammed Ali
State rep by the District Collector
Adv. Government pleader
The revenue divisional officer
Adv. G.P.
The Tahsildar, Ponneri
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a District Civil Court order (A.V. No. 52/2015) from Panneri dated 19.01.2026 documenting the examination and cross-examination of witness PW2 (Chinmayya) in a property dispute case. The witness testified regarding land ownership, cultivation history, property transactions involving 24 cents of land, and family relationships, with examination concluding at 12:11 p.m. The document records the witness's statements under cross-examination but does not contain a final judgment or specific court order on the substantive case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a District Civil Court order (A.V. No. 52/2015) from Panneri dated 19.01.2026 documenting the examination and cross-examination of witness PW2 (Chinmayya) in a property dispute case. The witness testified regarding land ownership, cultivation history, property transactions involving 24 cents of land, and family relationships, with examination concluding at 12:11 p.m. The document records the witness's statements under cross-examination but does not contain a final judgment or specific court order on the substantive case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts