Chamundeeswari vs Ranganathan — 32/2019
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(d), 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR200000752019
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
154/2019
Filing Date
26-06-2019
Registration No
32/2019
Registration Date
03-07-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Ponneri
Judge
1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chamundeeswari
Adv. D. Deenadayalan
Mohana Vignesh
Adv. D. Deenadayalan
Thiyageswarar
Adv. D. Deenadayalan
Jaisanthosh
Adv. D. Deenadayalan
Respondent(s)
Ranganathan
Pramila
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: A.V. No. 32/2019, District Court, Panneri (Tamil Nadu) Date: 23.01.2026 The court recorded the cross-examination of Plaintiff's Witness 1 (PW1) in a land property dispute case. During examination, the witness's testimony regarding property ownership, inheritance rights, and documentary evidence (particularly documents W.S.A. 8, 9, and 10) was extensively questioned. The witness made contradictory statements about when certain documents were obtained and their authenticity, particularly regarding the signature of the witness's father on W.S.A. 9. The cross-examination concluded at 12:35 p.m. with the case remaining pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: A.V. No. 32/2019, District Court, Panneri (Tamil Nadu) Date: 23.01.2026 The court recorded the cross-examination of Plaintiff's Witness 1 (PW1) in a land property dispute case. During examination, the witness's testimony regarding property ownership, inheritance rights, and documentary evidence (particularly documents W.S.A. 8, 9, and 10) was extensively questioned. The witness made contradictory statements about when certain documents were obtained and their authenticity, particularly regarding the signature of the witness's father on W.S.A. 9. The cross-examination concluded at 12:35 p.m. with the case remaining pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts