Sindhuja vs The District Collecter — 52/2020
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(d). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR200000432020
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
96/2020
Filing Date
02-09-2020
Registration No
52/2020
Registration Date
22-12-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Ponneri
Judge
1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sindhuja
Adv. T.Prabhu Arasu
M. Sinduri
M. Rohith Ramanan
Respondent(s)
The District Collecter
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The Tahsildar
The Chairman
The Deputy Director, DNA Division
P. Indirani
Dhanalakshmi
Sri Narayana Balaji
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This Tamil court order (A.V. No. 52/2020) documents the cross-examination of witness PW1 Sinduja on 25.02.2026 in a civil case involving disputed inheritance and marital benefits. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding a deceased Port Trust employee named Mani, his marriage to Indhrani, and disputes over terminal and retirement benefits between Indhrani and Mani's relatives (defendants 6-8). The case appears to concern whether Indhrani and her children are legitimate heirs entitled to the deceased's benefits, with the witness testifying about the earlier dismissed matrimonial case (HMOP No. 4442/2011) and various documents related to the succession and benefits dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This Tamil court order (A.V. No. 52/2020) documents the cross-examination of witness PW1 Sinduja on 25.02.2026 in a civil case involving disputed inheritance and marital benefits. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding a deceased Port Trust employee named Mani, his marriage to Indhrani, and disputes over terminal and retirement benefits between Indhrani and Mani's relatives (defendants 6-8). The case appears to concern whether Indhrani and her children are legitimate heirs entitled to the deceased's benefits, with the witness testifying about the earlier dismissed matrimonial case (HMOP No. 4442/2011) and various documents related to the succession and benefits dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts