Sumithra @ Dilliammal vs Muthammal and 4 others Advocate - Ramarajan — 39/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR200000432016
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
39/2016
Filing Date
05-03-2016
Registration No
39/2016
Registration Date
05-03-2016
Court
District Munsif Court, Ponneri
Judge
1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sumithra @ Dilliammal
Adv. T.Susairaj
Respondent(s)
Muthammal and 4 others Advocate - Ramarajan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil suit (A.S. No. 39/2016) from the District Court of Panneri regarding a land dispute. The court examined witness testimony (DW1) on March 6, 2026, and continued cross-examination of the defendant's witness regarding ownership and possession of agricultural land (survey numbers 174, 175, 176/1). The case was adjourned to allow further cross-examination, as the court found several factual disputes regarding land transactions, cultivation rights, and the validity of prior judgments from an original case (O.S. No. 94/1998) that need clarification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil suit (A.S. No. 39/2016) from the District Court of Panneri regarding a land dispute. The court examined witness testimony (DW1) on March 6, 2026, and continued cross-examination of the defendant's witness regarding ownership and possession of agricultural land (survey numbers 174, 175, 176/1). The case was adjourned to allow further cross-examination, as the court found several factual disputes regarding land transactions, cultivation rights, and the validity of prior judgments from an original case (O.S. No. 94/1998) that need clarification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts