Venkaiah Maistry vs Duraisamy — 31/2017
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b),25(d). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR200000312017
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
31/2017
Filing Date
15-02-2017
Registration No
31/2017
Registration Date
15-02-2017
Court
District Munsif Court, Ponneri
Judge
1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkaiah Maistry
Adv. R Krishnaswamy
Respondent(s)
Duraisamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Ponneri
Judgement
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 23-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 16-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 06-02-2026 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil court document from the District Civil Court, Panneri (Case No. A.V. 31/2017) recording witness examination proceedings on February 23, 2026. The case involves a land dispute where the plaintiff claims 20 cents of land was erroneously recorded as 18 cents in the patta (title deed), with witness Srinivasan (PW1) testifying about the property boundaries and asserting ownership of the full 20 cents. The examination was conducted from 12:01 PM to 12:07 PM under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, Section 10, but the document does not contain a final court order or judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil court document from the District Civil Court, Panneri (Case No. A.V. 31/2017) recording witness examination proceedings on February 23, 2026. The case involves a land dispute where the plaintiff claims 20 cents of land was erroneously recorded as 18 cents in the patta (title deed), with witness Srinivasan (PW1) testifying about the property boundaries and asserting ownership of the full 20 cents. The examination was conducted from 12:01 PM to 12:07 PM under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, Section 10, but the document does not contain a final court order or judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts