A.Vinothkumar vs Bajaj Finance Limited,Rep by Manager ,(Personal loan Section) Advocate - M.Jayamurugan — 58/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o7R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR160000752025
Filing Number
82/2025
Filing Date
19-Jun-2025
Registration No
58/2025
Registration Date
24-Jun-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruvottiyur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A.Vinothkumar
Adv. M.Ansar Basha
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bajaj Finance Limited,Rep by Manager ,(Personal loan Section) Advocate - M.Jayamurugan
Case History
-
24-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif
-
04-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Petition Dismissed The petition filed by A. Vinothkumar seeking an interim injunction against Bajaji Finance Limited to restrain alleged harassment by collection agents was dismissed by the District Munsif, Thiruvottiyur on March 4, 2026. The court found that the petitioner failed to provide proper evidence to prove the claimed interference and harassment, placing the burden on him to substantiate his allegations for interim relief, which he could not establish. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Mar-2026
Issues
District Munsif
-
02-Mar-2026
Issues
District Munsif
-
27-Feb-2026
Issues
District Munsif
-
24-Feb-2026
Issues
District Munsif
-
20-Feb-2026
Issues
District Munsif
-
07-Feb-2026
Issues
District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2026
Issues
District Munsif
-
17-Dec-2025
Issues
District Munsif
-
21-Nov-2025
Issues
District Munsif
-
31-Oct-2025
Issues
District Munsif
-
24-Oct-2025
Issues
District Munsif
-
23-Sep-2025
Await Notice
District Munsif
-
25-Aug-2025
Await Notice
District Munsif
-
24-Jul-2025
Await Notice
District Munsif
-
24-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2025
Petition Dismissed The petition filed by A. Vinothkumar seeking an interim injunction against Bajaji Finance Limited to restrain alleged harassment by collection agents was dismissed by the District Munsif, Thiruvottiyur on March 4, 2026. The court found that the petitioner failed to provide proper evidence to prove the claimed interference and harassment, placing the burden on him to substantiate his allegations for interim relief, which he could not establish. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts