The Ashok Leyland employees Co-op Indus Housing Society Ltd by its President vs Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board and 3 others Advocate - G. Prakash — 199/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7RULE1OFCPC. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR160000212014
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
199/2014
Filing Date
23-07-2014
Registration No
199/2014
Registration Date
23-07-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruvottiyur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Ashok Leyland employees Co-op Indus Housing Society Ltd by its President
Adv. N.R.Gopalan
Respondent(s)
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board and 3 others Advocate - G. Prakash
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by The Ashok Leyland Employees Cooperative Industrial Housing Society Limited under Order 7 Rule 14(3) and Section 151 of CPC seeking leave to file a certified copy of the High Court's interim injunction order dated 11.08.2015 (in a related writ petition) was allowed. The court found that the petitioner should be given sufficient opportunity to present their case in the interest of justice, and allowing the petition would not cause prejudice to the respondents. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by The Ashok Leyland Employees Cooperative Industrial Housing Society Limited under Order 7 Rule 14(3) and Section 151 of CPC seeking leave to file a certified copy of the High Court's interim injunction order dated 11.08.2015 (in a related writ petition) was allowed. The court found that the petitioner should be given sufficient opportunity to present their case in the interest of justice, and allowing the petition would not cause prejudice to the respondents. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts