R. Vijay vs Thirisanghu — 310/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTR100014042022
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
342/2022
Filing Date
28-12-2022
Registration No
310/2022
Registration Date
28-12-2022
Court
Sub Court, Ponneri
Judge
3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R. Vijay
Adv. S.C. Pallavan, K. Bharath Kumar, S. Jagannathan
Respondent(s)
Thirisanghu
SBI General Insurance Company Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri
IA Pending
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 17-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 06-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 21-01-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: M.C.O.P. No. 310/2022, Additional District Court, Pondicherry (Dated: 21/01/2026) Outcome: The petition is disposed of as settled. The court ordered that Defendant 2 (the insurance company) shall pay compensation of ₹70,000 to the petitioner (Vijay) out of the total medical expenses of ₹2,50,000, with the remaining amount to be borne by the petitioner. The petitioner's claims against Defendant 1 (the vehicle owner/driver) regarding additional compensation were found unsubstantiated based on the evidence and witness testimony presented. The case involved a motor vehicle accident dated 22.08.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: M.C.O.P. No. 310/2022, Additional District Court, Pondicherry (Dated: 21/01/2026) Outcome: The petition is disposed of as settled. The court ordered that Defendant 2 (the insurance company) shall pay compensation of ₹70,000 to the petitioner (Vijay) out of the total medical expenses of ₹2,50,000, with the remaining amount to be borne by the petitioner. The petitioner's claims against Defendant 1 (the vehicle owner/driver) regarding additional compensation were found unsubstantiated based on the evidence and witness testimony presented. The case involved a motor vehicle accident dated 22.08.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts