MUTHU vs MANAVALAN — 570/2016

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 24(1). Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTR100011792016

Enquiry

Next Hearing

18th March 2026

Filing Number

570/2016

Filing Date

14-09-2016

Registration No

570/2016

Registration Date

14-09-2016

Court

Sub Court, Ponneri

Judge

3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 24(1)

Petitioner(s)

MUTHU

Adv. R. KALAMEGAM

Respondent(s)

MANAVALAN

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO, LTD.,

Adv. Exp

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

06-03-2026

Enquiry

25-02-2026

Enquiry

11-02-2026

Enquiry

06-02-2026

Enquiry

21-01-2026

Enquiry

Interim Orders

26-11-2025
Copy of Deposition

CASE OUTCOME SUMMARY: In this motor accident injury case (M.C.O.P. No. 570/2016) heard on 26/11/2025, the Additional Sessions Court in Pondicherry recorded the examination of the first witness (PW1 - Muthu) regarding a two-wheeler accident. The witness testified about the accident circumstances, injuries sustained (hospitalized for 5 days), and identified the opposing party's two-wheeler as causing the accident through negligence. The court found the first defendant (vehicle owner Manivannan) liable and dismissed the second defendant (insurance company) from liability, ruling that compensation should be recovered from the first defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE OUTCOME SUMMARY: In this motor accident injury case (M.C.O.P. No. 570/2016) heard on 26/11/2025, the Additional Sessions Court in Pondicherry recorded the examination of the first witness (PW1 - Muthu) regarding a two-wheeler accident. The witness testified about the accident circumstances, injuries sustained (hospitalized for 5 days), and identified the opposing party's two-wheeler as causing the accident through negligence. The court found the first defendant (vehicle owner Manivannan) liable and dismissed the second defendant (insurance company) from liability, ruling that compensation should be recovered from the first defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Ponneri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case