Saravanan vs T.S. Selvakumar — 248/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTR100010792021
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
214/2021
Filing Date
08-12-2021
Registration No
248/2021
Registration Date
08-12-2021
Court
Sub Court, Ponneri
Judge
3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saravanan
Adv. MSLR Association
Respondent(s)
T.S. Selvakumar
The Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 04-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 19-12-2025 | Enquiry |
| 14-11-2025 | Enquiry |
| 08-10-2025 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil case (MCOP No. 248/2021) from the Additional District Court in Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, dated July 30, 2025, regarding a vehicle accident claim. The petitioner, Saravan (age 27), sought compensation of ₹5,00,000 for injuries sustained in a bus accident on August 16, 2016, in Orosemuthiram. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony detailing how he was injured while disembarking from a bus (vehicle registration TN 21 A 2799) that suddenly accelerated, causing him to fall. The petitioner claimed minor injuries and received government hospital treatment. The court heard the petitioner's statement but noted there was no further examination. The order appears to be a procedural recording of the petitioner's oral testimony in open court on the date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil case (MCOP No. 248/2021) from the Additional District Court in Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, dated July 30, 2025, regarding a vehicle accident claim. The petitioner, Saravan (age 27), sought compensation of ₹5,00,000 for injuries sustained in a bus accident on August 16, 2016, in Orosemuthiram. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony detailing how he was injured while disembarking from a bus (vehicle registration TN 21 A 2799) that suddenly accelerated, causing him to fall. The petitioner claimed minor injuries and received government hospital treatment. The court heard the petitioner's statement but noted there was no further examination. The order appears to be a procedural recording of the petitioner's oral testimony in open court on the date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts