Saravanan vs T.S. Selvakumar — 248/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTR100010792021

Enquiry

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

Filing Number

214/2021

Filing Date

08-12-2021

Registration No

248/2021

Registration Date

08-12-2021

Court

Sub Court, Ponneri

Judge

3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Saravanan

Adv. MSLR Association

Respondent(s)

T.S. Selvakumar

The Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

06-03-2026

Enquiry

04-02-2026

Enquiry

19-12-2025

Enquiry

14-11-2025

Enquiry

08-10-2025

Enquiry

Interim Orders

30-07-2025
Copy of Deposition

Summary This is a civil case (MCOP No. 248/2021) from the Additional District Court in Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, dated July 30, 2025, regarding a vehicle accident claim. The petitioner, Saravan (age 27), sought compensation of ₹5,00,000 for injuries sustained in a bus accident on August 16, 2016, in Orosemuthiram. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony detailing how he was injured while disembarking from a bus (vehicle registration TN 21 A 2799) that suddenly accelerated, causing him to fall. The petitioner claimed minor injuries and received government hospital treatment. The court heard the petitioner's statement but noted there was no further examination. The order appears to be a procedural recording of the petitioner's oral testimony in open court on the date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil case (MCOP No. 248/2021) from the Additional District Court in Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, dated July 30, 2025, regarding a vehicle accident claim. The petitioner, Saravan (age 27), sought compensation of ₹5,00,000 for injuries sustained in a bus accident on August 16, 2016, in Orosemuthiram. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony detailing how he was injured while disembarking from a bus (vehicle registration TN 21 A 2799) that suddenly accelerated, causing him to fall. The petitioner claimed minor injuries and received government hospital treatment. The court heard the petitioner's statement but noted there was no further examination. The order appears to be a procedural recording of the petitioner's oral testimony in open court on the date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Ponneri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case