Praveen kumar vs Sathishmurugan — 279/2018

Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTR100009192018

Evidence

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

279/2018

Filing Date

26-09-2018

Registration No

279/2018

Registration Date

26-09-2018

Court

Sub Court, Ponneri

Judge

2-Principal Sub Judge, Ponneri

Petitioner(s)

Praveen kumar

Adv. MSLR

Respondent(s)

Sathishmurugan

New India Assurance co ltd

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Principal Sub Judge, Ponneri

06-03-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Evidence

12-11-2025

Enquiry

22-08-2025

Counter

Interim Orders

06-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a motor accident compensation case (M.C.O.P. No. 279/2018) heard by the Principal District Judge of Pondicherry on February 6, 2026. The claimant, a 27-year-old employee, sought compensation for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on March 11, 2018, claiming ₹20,000 as monthly salary loss and medical expenses. The court admitted the claimant's testimony and documentary evidence (vehicle registration, insurance certificate, driver's license, hospital discharge documents) and recorded the cross-examination of the opposite party. The final order states that both the claim and the opposite party's counter-arguments are recorded, with the matter reserved for final judgment/decision on compensation liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a motor accident compensation case (M.C.O.P. No. 279/2018) heard by the Principal District Judge of Pondicherry on February 6, 2026. The claimant, a 27-year-old employee, sought compensation for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on March 11, 2018, claiming ₹20,000 as monthly salary loss and medical expenses. The court admitted the claimant's testimony and documentary evidence (vehicle registration, insurance certificate, driver's license, hospital discharge documents) and recorded the cross-examination of the opposite party. The final order states that both the claim and the opposite party's counter-arguments are recorded, with the matter reserved for final judgment/decision on compensation liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Ponneri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case