Praveen kumar vs Sathishmurugan — 279/2018
Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTR100009192018
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
279/2018
Filing Date
26-09-2018
Registration No
279/2018
Registration Date
26-09-2018
Court
Sub Court, Ponneri
Judge
2-Principal Sub Judge, Ponneri
Petitioner(s)
Praveen kumar
Adv. MSLR
Respondent(s)
Sathishmurugan
New India Assurance co ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal Sub Judge, Ponneri
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Enquiry
Counter
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-11-2025 | Enquiry | |
| 22-08-2025 | Counter |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a motor accident compensation case (M.C.O.P. No. 279/2018) heard by the Principal District Judge of Pondicherry on February 6, 2026. The claimant, a 27-year-old employee, sought compensation for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on March 11, 2018, claiming ₹20,000 as monthly salary loss and medical expenses. The court admitted the claimant's testimony and documentary evidence (vehicle registration, insurance certificate, driver's license, hospital discharge documents) and recorded the cross-examination of the opposite party. The final order states that both the claim and the opposite party's counter-arguments are recorded, with the matter reserved for final judgment/decision on compensation liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a motor accident compensation case (M.C.O.P. No. 279/2018) heard by the Principal District Judge of Pondicherry on February 6, 2026. The claimant, a 27-year-old employee, sought compensation for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on March 11, 2018, claiming ₹20,000 as monthly salary loss and medical expenses. The court admitted the claimant's testimony and documentary evidence (vehicle registration, insurance certificate, driver's license, hospital discharge documents) and recorded the cross-examination of the opposite party. The final order states that both the claim and the opposite party's counter-arguments are recorded, with the matter reserved for final judgment/decision on compensation liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts