Pazhani vs The managing director — 115/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTR100007182022
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
115/2022
Filing Date
01-07-2022
Registration No
115/2022
Registration Date
01-08-2022
Court
Sub Court, Ponneri
Judge
2-Principal Sub Judge, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pazhani
Respondent(s)
The managing director
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal Sub Judge, Ponneri
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-10-2025 | Evidence |
| 18-07-2025 | Counter |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language court order from the Principal District Court, Pondicherry (MSO No. 115/2022, dated October 8, 2025) under Section 10(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The case involves a motor vehicle accident occurring on March 24, 2022, at 8:00 PM where the petitioner (Palani, age 55) claims injuries including broken teeth. The petitioner testified regarding the accident circumstances and denied crossing a flooded road as the cause, while contesting the opponent's liability claim. Outcome: The court recorded the petitioner's sworn examination statement and admitted documentary evidence (8 exhibits from petitioner side). The case proceedings appear to be in an evidentiary stage with cross-examination completed, pending further court orders on liability and compensation determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language court order from the Principal District Court, Pondicherry (MSO No. 115/2022, dated October 8, 2025) under Section 10(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The case involves a motor vehicle accident occurring on March 24, 2022, at 8:00 PM where the petitioner (Palani, age 55) claims injuries including broken teeth. The petitioner testified regarding the accident circumstances and denied crossing a flooded road as the cause, while contesting the opponent's liability claim. Outcome: The court recorded the petitioner's sworn examination statement and admitted documentary evidence (8 exhibits from petitioner side). The case proceedings appear to be in an evidentiary stage with cross-examination completed, pending further court orders on liability and compensation determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts