Pazhani vs The managing director — 115/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTR100007182022

Evidence

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

Filing Number

115/2022

Filing Date

01-07-2022

Registration No

115/2022

Registration Date

01-08-2022

Court

Sub Court, Ponneri

Judge

2-Principal Sub Judge, Ponneri

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Pazhani

Respondent(s)

The managing director

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Principal Sub Judge, Ponneri

06-03-2026

Evidence

04-02-2026

Evidence

02-01-2026

Evidence

08-10-2025

Evidence

18-07-2025

Counter

Interim Orders

08-10-2025
Copy of Deposition

This is a Tamil language court order from the Principal District Court, Pondicherry (MSO No. 115/2022, dated October 8, 2025) under Section 10(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The case involves a motor vehicle accident occurring on March 24, 2022, at 8:00 PM where the petitioner (Palani, age 55) claims injuries including broken teeth. The petitioner testified regarding the accident circumstances and denied crossing a flooded road as the cause, while contesting the opponent's liability claim. Outcome: The court recorded the petitioner's sworn examination statement and admitted documentary evidence (8 exhibits from petitioner side). The case proceedings appear to be in an evidentiary stage with cross-examination completed, pending further court orders on liability and compensation determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Tamil language court order from the Principal District Court, Pondicherry (MSO No. 115/2022, dated October 8, 2025) under Section 10(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The case involves a motor vehicle accident occurring on March 24, 2022, at 8:00 PM where the petitioner (Palani, age 55) claims injuries including broken teeth. The petitioner testified regarding the accident circumstances and denied crossing a flooded road as the cause, while contesting the opponent's liability claim. Outcome: The court recorded the petitioner's sworn examination statement and admitted documentary evidence (8 exhibits from petitioner side). The case proceedings appear to be in an evidentiary stage with cross-examination completed, pending further court orders on liability and compensation determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Ponneri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case