Minor Sairaghavan Rep. by his father Rajesh Kumar vs Kumaresan — 71/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTR100005252021
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
71/2021
Filing Date
24-06-2021
Registration No
71/2021
Registration Date
24-06-2021
Court
Sub Court, Ponneri
Judge
3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Minor Sairaghavan Rep. by his father Rajesh Kumar
Adv. K.R.Lazar and N.Venkatesan
Respondent(s)
Kumaresan
Reliance General Insurance Co, Ltd.,
Adv. T.Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 04-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 02-01-2026 | Enquiry |
| 19-11-2025 | Enquiry |
| 22-10-2025 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a compensation petition (M.C.O.P. No. 71/2021) filed in the Additional District Court, Pondicherry, dated 27 February 2025, arising from a motor vehicle accident. The petitioner claimed compensation for injuries to his son caused by a speeding two-wheeler driven by the second respondent. The court admitted the petition, recorded the petitioner's testimony on oath under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1878, and marked 13 documentary exhibits including FIR, medical records, vehicle registration, and accident investigation reports. The proceedings remain ongoing with cross-examination of the second respondent completed, and the matter is pending judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a compensation petition (M.C.O.P. No. 71/2021) filed in the Additional District Court, Pondicherry, dated 27 February 2025, arising from a motor vehicle accident. The petitioner claimed compensation for injuries to his son caused by a speeding two-wheeler driven by the second respondent. The court admitted the petition, recorded the petitioner's testimony on oath under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1878, and marked 13 documentary exhibits including FIR, medical records, vehicle registration, and accident investigation reports. The proceedings remain ongoing with cross-examination of the second respondent completed, and the matter is pending judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts