Minor Sairaghavan Rep. by his father Rajesh Kumar vs Kumaresan — 71/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTR100005252021

Enquiry

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

Filing Number

71/2021

Filing Date

24-06-2021

Registration No

71/2021

Registration Date

24-06-2021

Court

Sub Court, Ponneri

Judge

3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Minor Sairaghavan Rep. by his father Rajesh Kumar

Adv. K.R.Lazar and N.Venkatesan

Respondent(s)

Kumaresan

Reliance General Insurance Co, Ltd.,

Adv. T.Kumar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

06-03-2026

Enquiry

04-02-2026

Enquiry

02-01-2026

Enquiry

19-11-2025

Enquiry

22-10-2025

Enquiry

Interim Orders

27-02-2025
Copy of Deposition

Court Order Summary This is a compensation petition (M.C.O.P. No. 71/2021) filed in the Additional District Court, Pondicherry, dated 27 February 2025, arising from a motor vehicle accident. The petitioner claimed compensation for injuries to his son caused by a speeding two-wheeler driven by the second respondent. The court admitted the petition, recorded the petitioner's testimony on oath under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1878, and marked 13 documentary exhibits including FIR, medical records, vehicle registration, and accident investigation reports. The proceedings remain ongoing with cross-examination of the second respondent completed, and the matter is pending judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary This is a compensation petition (M.C.O.P. No. 71/2021) filed in the Additional District Court, Pondicherry, dated 27 February 2025, arising from a motor vehicle accident. The petitioner claimed compensation for injuries to his son caused by a speeding two-wheeler driven by the second respondent. The court admitted the petition, recorded the petitioner's testimony on oath under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1878, and marked 13 documentary exhibits including FIR, medical records, vehicle registration, and accident investigation reports. The proceedings remain ongoing with cross-examination of the second respondent completed, and the matter is pending judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Ponneri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case