Ajeetkumargothi vs Venkatesan Advocate - M.Praveen Kumar — 100102/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 42(a)and27(c)ofTNCFAct. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR100004532015
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
100102/2015
Filing Date
24-04-2015
Registration No
100102/2015
Registration Date
24-04-2015
Court
Sub Court, Ponneri
Judge
3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajeetkumargothi
Adv. N.R.Anantha Rama Krishnan
Respondent(s)
Venkatesan Advocate - M.Praveen Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil case (Original Case No. 102/2015) heard in the Additional District Court, Pondicherry on February 9, 2026. The court recorded the cross-examination of the defendant witness (DW1 - Venkateson) regarding a loan agreement dated March 15, 2005, and agricultural machinery purchase documents dated August 13, 2008. The witness testified about receiving ₹2 lakhs as a loan against harvesting equipment valued at ₹5 lakhs, with detailed examination of documentary evidence and transaction details. The cross-examination was adjourned pending instructions from the opposing counsel's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil case (Original Case No. 102/2015) heard in the Additional District Court, Pondicherry on February 9, 2026. The court recorded the cross-examination of the defendant witness (DW1 - Venkateson) regarding a loan agreement dated March 15, 2005, and agricultural machinery purchase documents dated August 13, 2008. The witness testified about receiving ₹2 lakhs as a loan against harvesting equipment valued at ₹5 lakhs, with detailed examination of documentary evidence and transaction details. The cross-examination was adjourned pending instructions from the opposing counsel's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts