Guduru Krishnaiah vs Potaliya Enterprise Rep. by Mr. Hariram, — 124/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 18-Mar-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTR100003352023

Filing Number

124/2023

Filing Date

10-Mar-2023

Registration No

124/2023

Registration Date

10-Mar-2023

Court

Sub Court, Ponneri

Judge

3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Guduru Krishnaiah

    Adv. S. Suresh Kumar, S. Balaji, R. Kanchana and M. Archana

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Potaliya Enterprise Rep. by Mr. Hariram,

  2. 2.Sunkara Jagadeesh

  3. 3.United India Insurance Company Ltd.,

Case History

  1. 18-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  9. 03-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  10. 05-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This Additional District Court order (MCOP 124/2023, dated 05/11/2025) in Pondicherry records the examination of witness RW1 Ulaghanathan regarding a motor vehicle accident case. The witness testified that vehicle AP 39 KW 4994 was insured with their company at the time of the accident, and disputed claims that three persons were riding the two-wheeler, stating no documentary evidence supports such allegations. The court noted the witness's testimony was recorded and cross-examined before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 05-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  12. 22-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  13. 24-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  14. 10-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  16. 09-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  17. 02-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  18. 25-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 25-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  20. 13-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  21. 05-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  22. 06-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  23. 21-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  24. 10-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  25. 10-Sep-2024

    Counter

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  26. 25-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  27. 18-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  28. 29-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  29. 08-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  30. 21-Dec-2023

    Counter

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  31. 16-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  32. 05-Oct-2023

    Counter

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  33. 10-Aug-2023

    Counter

    Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

  34. 28-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 10-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 124/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This Additional District Court order (MCOP 124/2023, dated 05/11/2025) in Pondicherry records the examination of witness RW1 Ulaghanathan regarding a motor vehicle accident case. The witness testified that vehicle AP 39 KW 4994 was insured with their company at the time of the accident, and disputed claims that three persons were riding the two-wheeler, stating no documentary evidence supports such allegations. The court noted the witness's testimony was recorded and cross-examined before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case