Kiruba vs M. Jagadeesan — 24/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTR100000732021

Enquiry

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

Filing Number

32/2021

Filing Date

11-02-2021

Registration No

24/2021

Registration Date

11-02-2021

Court

Sub Court, Ponneri

Judge

3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Kiruba

Adv. E. Anbarasu

Respondent(s)

M. Jagadeesan

The Manager, Reliance General Insurance Co., Ltd.,

Adv. B.Murugavel

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri

06-03-2026

Enquiry

04-02-2026

Enquiry

19-12-2025

Enquiry

07-11-2025

Enquiry

08-10-2025

Enquiry

Interim Orders

03-09-2025
Copy of Deposition

SUMMARY: This is a Tamil court order from the Additional District Court in Pondicherry (Case No. 24/2021, dated 03/09/2025) recording the cross-examination testimony of the plaintiff, Krishna (age 51) from Nagapattinam, Andhra Pradesh, in a motor accident case. The witness testified about a two-wheeler accident that occurred around 5:00 AM, resulting in injuries requiring three abdominal surgeries and three months of hospitalization, with daily medical expenses of Rs. 1000. The court recorded that the defendant two-wheeler driver lacked proper driving license and noted that compensation liability issues would be determined in subsequent proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: This is a Tamil court order from the Additional District Court in Pondicherry (Case No. 24/2021, dated 03/09/2025) recording the cross-examination testimony of the plaintiff, Krishna (age 51) from Nagapattinam, Andhra Pradesh, in a motor accident case. The witness testified about a two-wheeler accident that occurred around 5:00 AM, resulting in injuries requiring three abdominal surgeries and three months of hospitalization, with daily medical expenses of Rs. 1000. The court recorded that the defendant two-wheeler driver lacked proper driving license and noted that compensation liability issues would be determined in subsequent proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Ponneri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case