Kiruba vs M. Jagadeesan — 24/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTR100000732021
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
32/2021
Filing Date
11-02-2021
Registration No
24/2021
Registration Date
11-02-2021
Court
Sub Court, Ponneri
Judge
3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kiruba
Adv. E. Anbarasu
Respondent(s)
M. Jagadeesan
The Manager, Reliance General Insurance Co., Ltd.,
Adv. B.Murugavel
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 04-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 19-12-2025 | Enquiry |
| 07-11-2025 | Enquiry |
| 08-10-2025 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: This is a Tamil court order from the Additional District Court in Pondicherry (Case No. 24/2021, dated 03/09/2025) recording the cross-examination testimony of the plaintiff, Krishna (age 51) from Nagapattinam, Andhra Pradesh, in a motor accident case. The witness testified about a two-wheeler accident that occurred around 5:00 AM, resulting in injuries requiring three abdominal surgeries and three months of hospitalization, with daily medical expenses of Rs. 1000. The court recorded that the defendant two-wheeler driver lacked proper driving license and noted that compensation liability issues would be determined in subsequent proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: This is a Tamil court order from the Additional District Court in Pondicherry (Case No. 24/2021, dated 03/09/2025) recording the cross-examination testimony of the plaintiff, Krishna (age 51) from Nagapattinam, Andhra Pradesh, in a motor accident case. The witness testified about a two-wheeler accident that occurred around 5:00 AM, resulting in injuries requiring three abdominal surgeries and three months of hospitalization, with daily medical expenses of Rs. 1000. The court recorded that the defendant two-wheeler driver lacked proper driving license and noted that compensation liability issues would be determined in subsequent proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts