P.Sangeetha and 3 others vs M.Devi — 414/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Ex-Parte Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR090008422024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
170/2024
Filing Date
18-07-2024
Registration No
414/2024
Registration Date
03-08-2024
Court
III. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Sangeetha and 3 others
Adv. S.Ramajayam
P.Monish
P.Kavya
P.Divya
Respondent(s)
M.Devi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Orders
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Orders |
| 17-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 30-10-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 414/2024 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court ordered attachment of the defendant's 1/3 share in the scheduled property (Survey Nos. 46/13, 47/4, 47/6, 47/7, 47/9 at J.P. Nagar, Thiruvallur) for Rs. 12,40,000/-, with attachment batta to be completed within one week. The plaintiffs (heirs of Premkumar) sought to recover Rs. 12,40,000 (principal loan of Rs. 10,00,000 plus 12% annual interest) from the defendant (sister of deceased), who borrowed money in 2022 on a promissory note. After receiving legal notice, the defendant attempted to dispose of/remove her property to defeat any decree. The court found the plaintiffs satisfied all requirements under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC for pre-judgment attachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 414/2024 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court ordered attachment of the defendant's 1/3 share in the scheduled property (Survey Nos. 46/13, 47/4, 47/6, 47/7, 47/9 at J.P. Nagar, Thiruvallur) for Rs. 12,40,000/-, with attachment batta to be completed within one week. The plaintiffs (heirs of Premkumar) sought to recover Rs. 12,40,000 (principal loan of Rs. 10,00,000 plus 12% annual interest) from the defendant (sister of deceased), who borrowed money in 2022 on a promissory note. After receiving legal notice, the defendant attempted to dispose of/remove her property to defeat any decree. The court found the plaintiffs satisfied all requirements under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC for pre-judgment attachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts