V. Subramani vs J. Jebasili — 553/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Settled out of court on 15th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR090007892023
Filing Number
303/2023
Filing Date
08-11-2023
Registration No
553/2023
Registration Date
10-11-2023
Court
III. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled out of court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V. Subramani
Adv. S. Thilaka
Respondent(s)
J. Jebasili
B.Devaraj (Deceased)
The Sub Registrar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Disposed
Orders
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Orders |
| 18-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 12-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 10-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of plaintiff V. Subramani (PW1) in O.S. 553/2023 before the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur on 22-10-2025. The plaintiff testified under oath regarding a property dispute, submitting 14 documentary exhibits including sale deeds dated 1992 and 1998, Powers of Attorney from 1989-1990, a 2023 survey report, online municipal certificates, utility receipts, and guideline value documents as evidence. No cross-examination was conducted as the defendants did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of plaintiff V. Subramani (PW1) in O.S. 553/2023 before the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur on 22-10-2025. The plaintiff testified under oath regarding a property dispute, submitting 14 documentary exhibits including sale deeds dated 1992 and 1998, Powers of Attorney from 1989-1990, a 2023 survey report, online municipal certificates, utility receipts, and guideline value documents as evidence. No cross-examination was conducted as the defendants did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts