Pushpa(Legal Heir) vs Ganesan — 72/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTR090007402024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
13-06-2024
Filing Number
72/2024
Filing Date
21-06-2024
Registration No
72/2024
Registration Date
11-07-2024
Court
III. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pushpa(Legal Heir)
Adv. YUVARAJ JAYARAJ1.
Kathirvel
Adv. YUVARAJ JAYARAJ
Respondent(s)
Ganesan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Arguments
Arguments
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Orders |
| 06-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: MCOP No. 72/2024 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal allowed the petitioners' (Pushpa and Kathirvel, legal heirs of deceased Ganapathy) petition seeking attachment of an uninsured container lorry (TN-04-AA-6148) before judgment. The court prohibited the first respondent (P. Ganesan, vehicle owner) from selling, mortgaging, or transferring the lorry, and directed the attachment order be forwarded to the Regional Transport Office. The case involved a fatal road accident claim, where the petitioners sought to secure the vehicle as security for potential compensation recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: MCOP No. 72/2024 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal allowed the petitioners' (Pushpa and Kathirvel, legal heirs of deceased Ganapathy) petition seeking attachment of an uninsured container lorry (TN-04-AA-6148) before judgment. The court prohibited the first respondent (P. Ganesan, vehicle owner) from selling, mortgaging, or transferring the lorry, and directed the attachment order be forwarded to the Regional Transport Office. The case involved a fatal road accident claim, where the petitioners sought to secure the vehicle as security for potential compensation recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts