Yuvaraj vs G.Venkatasan and others — 184/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTR090006292022
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
269/2022
Filing Date
07-11-2022
Registration No
184/2022
Registration Date
07-11-2022
Court
III. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yuvaraj
Adv. N. Ramakrishnan
Respondent(s)
G.Venkatasan and others
Abdul Hamid
THE NEW INIDA ASSURANCE CO., LTD.,
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Evidence
Evidence
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-11-2025 | Enquiry |
| 13-10-2025 | Enquiry |
| 08-08-2025 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of witness PW6 (Tmt. K. Shanthi, Assistant) in motor vehicle accident case MCOP.184/2022 at the Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur, dated 06-02-2026. The witness testified about a road accident involving multiple vehicles and submitted documentary evidence including accident registration, Aadhaar card, bank passbook, and PAN card. The court examined the witness's testimony regarding the accident circumstances, vehicle positions, and damage claims, with cross-examination by the third respondent's counsel concluding thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of witness PW6 (Tmt. K. Shanthi, Assistant) in motor vehicle accident case MCOP.184/2022 at the Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur, dated 06-02-2026. The witness testified about a road accident involving multiple vehicles and submitted documentary evidence including accident registration, Aadhaar card, bank passbook, and PAN card. The court examined the witness's testimony regarding the accident circumstances, vehicle positions, and damage claims, with cross-examination by the third respondent's counsel concluding thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts