Amutha vs Venkatesan.G and others — 181/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTR090006232022

Evidence

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

Filing Number

266/2022

Filing Date

07-11-2022

Registration No

181/2022

Registration Date

07-11-2022

Court

III. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee

Judge

2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section AmuthaTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO., LTD

Petitioner(s)

Amutha

Adv. N. Ramakrishnan

Respondent(s)

Venkatesan.G and others

Abdul Hamid

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO., LTD.,

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III

06-03-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Evidence

24-11-2025

Enquiry

13-10-2025

Enquiry

08-08-2025

Enquiry

Interim Orders

06-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW3) in motor vehicle accident cases (MCOP.181/2022 and connected matters) before the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur. The petitioner testified on 06-02-2026 regarding a vehicle collision while traveling to Tiruvannamalai, presenting hospital accident registration copies, Aadhar card, bank passbook, and PAN card as evidence. The court accepted the witness statement and cross-examination by the third respondent's counsel, with the matter proceeding on its merits for compensation determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW3) in motor vehicle accident cases (MCOP.181/2022 and connected matters) before the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur. The petitioner testified on 06-02-2026 regarding a vehicle collision while traveling to Tiruvannamalai, presenting hospital accident registration copies, Aadhar card, bank passbook, and PAN card as evidence. The court accepted the witness statement and cross-examination by the third respondent's counsel, with the matter proceeding on its merits for compensation determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

III. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case