V.Dineshkumar and another vs B.Dharanikumar and another Advocate - S.Bala Murugan — 490/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section u/s22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR090005452022
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
232/2022
Filing Date
14-09-2022
Registration No
490/2022
Registration Date
14-09-2022
Court
III. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V.Dineshkumar and another
Adv. P.S.Mathisekaran
Respondent(s)
B.Dharanikumar and another Advocate - S.Bala Murugan
Kanchana Devi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Evidence
Evidence
Orders
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 03-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 27-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 490/2022 - I.A. No. 4 of 2025 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court ordered PW1 (plaintiff) to be recalled for further cross-examination by the defendants. The defendants are directed to pay Rs. 2,000 as cost to the plaintiff within one month, though this is not a precondition. Key Issue: Defendants sought to recall the plaintiff's witness for cross-examination after their counsel failed to cross-examine during the scheduled hearing on 02.12.2024, allegedly due to the defendant's viral fever preventing case preparation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 490/2022 - I.A. No. 4 of 2025 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court ordered PW1 (plaintiff) to be recalled for further cross-examination by the defendants. The defendants are directed to pay Rs. 2,000 as cost to the plaintiff within one month, though this is not a precondition. Key Issue: Defendants sought to recall the plaintiff's witness for cross-examination after their counsel failed to cross-examine during the scheduled hearing on 02.12.2024, allegedly due to the defendant's viral fever preventing case preparation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts