K.Venkatesan vs M.Sivanesan — 200091/2018
Case under --- Section 138ofNIACT. Disposed: Contested--Compromised on 10th April 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNTR090003172018
Filing Number
200091/2018
Filing Date
07-08-2018
Registration No
200091/2018
Registration Date
07-08-2018
Court
III. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Compromised
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.Venkatesan
Adv. N.Maran
Respondent(s)
M.Sivanesan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Disposed
Judgement
Mediation
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-02-2026 | Mediation |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: K. Venkatesan v. M. Sivanesan (Crl.A. 91/2018) The appellate court set aside K. Venkatesan's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted him based on a settlement between the parties. Venkatesan was originally convicted of issuing a cheque for Rs. 8,50,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds; the appellate court allowed his appeal after he paid Rs. 1,00,000 to complainant M. Sivanesan in settlement, relying on Supreme Court precedent that permits compounding offences under Section 138 even at appellate stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: K. Venkatesan v. M. Sivanesan (Crl.A. 91/2018) The appellate court set aside K. Venkatesan's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted him based on a settlement between the parties. Venkatesan was originally convicted of issuing a cheque for Rs. 8,50,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds; the appellate court allowed his appeal after he paid Rs. 1,00,000 to complainant M. Sivanesan in settlement, relying on Supreme Court precedent that permits compounding offences under Section 138 even at appellate stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts